|
Možda
potpunoj odsutnosti analize uloge glavnih predstavnika projektnih
istraživanja u prvoj polovici prošlog stoljeća te originalnih
teorijskih, konceptualnih i lingvističkih doprinosa – ako te 50-e
godine odredimo kao početak dubokog procesa revizije koji se događa
na području projektiranja – valja pripisati djelovanje najsenzibilnijih
mladih arhitekata. Oni su sa sve većom netrpeljivošću gledali
na oskudnu didaktiku i manjak informacija, koje su bile “zamrznute”
na konzervativnoj liniji.
Među onima koji su svojim tekstovima ili svojim projektima potaknuli
duboko promišljanje misli i jezika u arhitektonskim istraživanjima
Hans Hollein se već tada ističe kao najsenzibilniji interpretator
nastojanja svoje generacije da pronađe ona kulturna uporišta koja
bi dala oblik i strukturu njihovoj viziji svijeta.
(...)
|
|
The conditions
for cultural-architectural discussion in the second half of the
1950s, in other words in conditions totally lacking any analysis
of the role of the main representatives of design research in
the first half of the century and of their most original theoretical,
conceptual and linguistic contributions, should be taken into
consideration if these years are to be defined as the beginning
of a serious review process taking place in the field of design.
It is the consequence of the work of the most perceptive young
architects who were becoming intolerant of the lack of didactics
and information, which were completely frozen by the conservative
approach.
Hans Hollein’s texts and projects stimulated serious discussion
about architectural thought and language; he was then already
the most perceptive interpreter of his generation’s efforts in
its search for those cultural cornerstones capable of yielding
a form and structure for their vision of the world.
(...)
|
|