|
URO1.ORG
Cooperative je skupina mladih arhitektov iz Santiaga de Chile,
ki so mlajši od tridesetih let in se predstavljajo kot "laboratorij
kulturoloških konceptov za prihodnost". Poslanstvo skupine
ilustrira tudi njihovo poimenovanje, v kodificirani obliki je
"uro" variacija besede "futuro", ki v španščini
pomeni "prihodnost", številka "1" je dodana
preprosto zato, da bi se izognili kakršnikoli zamenjavi z medicinsko
terminologijo, pripona ".org" daje ime lastnim spletnim
stranem, hkrati pa se sklicuje na celotno vsakodnevno kulturo
množične komunikacije. V skladu s tem člani kooperative ne izključujejo
ideje arhitekture kot potrošniške dobrine, hkrati pa zavračajo
banalno in komercialno arhitekturo. V popolnem nasprotju s trenutnimi
težnjami v moderni arhitekturi, ki mora biti trendovska in vsiljiva
za vsako ceno, se URO1.ORG osredinja na skorajda tekstualno ustvarjanje
avantgardne arhitekture, zamišljene kot kulturološki proces. Z
vnovičnim približevanjem osnovnemu interesu klasičnega modernizma,
pozabljenemu v poplavi formalnih pristopov preteklih desetletjih,
vztrajajo pri socialnem značaju svojih projektov.
(...)
|
|
URO1.ORG
Cooperative is a group of young architects from Santiago, aged
under 30, which defines itself as a "laboratory of cultural
concepts for the future". Even the name of the group illustrates
this, in codified form: "uro" is a subversion of the
word "futuro", which in Spanish means "future",
the number "1" is simply added to eliminate any confusion
with medical terminology, and the extension ".org" gives
the name of its own website, referring at the same time to a whole
everyday culture of mass communication. Accordingly, the members
of the cooperative do not exclude the idea of architecture as
a consumer good, yet they reject commonplace and commercial architecture.
In complete opposition to the actual tendencies of fashionable
architecture, trendy and blatant at any cost, URO1.ORG focuses
on an almost textual manufacturing of avant-garde architecture,
intended as a cultural process. And, re-approaching an essential
obsession of classic modernism, forgotten by the last decades'
avalanche of formal approaches, they insist on the social character
of their projects.
(...)
|
|