|
Ko
sem se pripravljal k pisanju tega besedila, sem pogooglal po spletnih
zapiskih z namenom, da bi se vseeno spomnil neizogibnih, burnih
strokovnih in drugih reakcij, pa tudi obračuna peščic, ki so spremljali
predstavljeni projekt. Z velikim zadovoljstvom sem ugotovil, da
mi je nemalo tega "trasha" uspelo potisniti iz spomina
in pozabiti. Če se poglobimo v bistvo tega spora, bomo odkrili
ključno besedo – Koeficient (Kin). In če bomo celotno zadevo opazovali
arhitekturno, bomo ugotovili, da je dal Koeficient, kot nikjer
v Zagrebu, temu projektu zrak. Preučevanje te v celoti, milo rečeno,
problematične teme bo naše sklepe povzelo v dveh neodvisnih stališčih:
-če Eurotower opazujemo s klasičnega stališča arhitekta-urbanista,
je opazno, da ima premišljeno in po zakonitostih elementarne urbanistične
kompozicije globoko zasnovano pozicijo in merilo, ki utrjujeta
naraven in zaželen razvoj Mesta, njegova arhitektura pa predstavlja
premišljen odmik od standardne poslovne gradnje;
(...)
|
|
While
I was preparing to write this article I browsed Google for web
headlines in order to remind myself of the turbulent, apparently
unavoidable, reactions of experts and others to this project that
went so far that one of them even involved fists. I was glad when
I realized how much of that "trash" I’d managed to suppress
and forget. If we look deep into this controversy we will find
one key word – Coefficient (Ku). Thanks to our architectural approach
we shall surely come to the conclusion that it was exactly this
Coefficient that gave this project some air like nowhere in Zagreb.
On the other hand, looking at this problematic subject, to say
the least, from a broader perspective all conclusions gather around
two focal points, in one way or another: the Eurotower, from a
classic architect/urbanist’s point of view, has a deliberate position
and scale, both strongly based on elementary urbanistic laws of
composition, which affirm the natural and desirable development
of the city while its architecture represents a considerate detachment
from usual office construction;
(...)
|
|